Cain? or Abel ?

03-28-2021

Victor David Hansen is one of the leading intellectuals in this country today. I recently watched a U-tube interview with him and noticed that 116,000 folks had listened to it. I’m disappointed. I wish 300 million would listen. Dr. Hansen says that regardless of how advanced we become, technologically, man the creature has not changed in 10,000 years. Human nature is our problem.

Today, we are inundated by statistics. What I want know: just how many people really want our government to morph into an enormous, totalitarian, one party system that tells its population what it can do and when. How many people truly embrace the nanny state?

Another great mind, Jordan Peterson, often points out Price’s Law, Fmd:> https://brainlid.org/general/2017/11/28/price-law.html, that 10% of the work force does more than 50% of the work. And that the larger an organization becomes, the less efficient it becomes. We don’t need a bigger government. We need a smaller one. We need these mega, monopoly corporations split up into smaller pieces too. We need to harness that 10% and let them lead the other 90% to become better. The private sector made this country. Not the government.

There is a theory that says the Cain and Abel story from Genesis is an allegory to the time when hunter gatherers first took up permanent roots to form towns and eventually cities. Or even earlier, when people first began sowing their own crops instead of merely keeping flocks and hunting and wandering. I choose the image of cities rising up amid the wilderness in order to create a clear distinction, but you can weave it any number of ways. Point being: from the tribe there became two different types of people.

It demonstrates the conflict between city dwellers and farmers. Cain was the city slicker, and Abel the farmer, although the story actually calls Cain “farmer” and Abel “herdsman”. You get the idea.

Thomas Jefferson was worried about too many people moving to the cities. Agriculture has always needed more workers than are ever available, yet farmers always seem to find a way to feed us. That’s Price’s Law. To take it further; imagine, 10% of all the farmers make half the food.

How many people live in the cities as opposed to the rural areas across our 50 states? Why do the city folk seem to lean towards a socialistic view that the government should give them free stuff? And why do rural people seem to ask only to be left alone, to be masters of their own fate? What is fair about taking from those who produce, and giving it to those who do not? Am I too simplistic?

Granted, finding jobs for every person in the city is a monumental challenge. But socialism does not motivate them to even look for work. Denying them freedom only depresses them that much more. Giving them handouts invalidates their value. Assuming they cannot get an legal ID in order to drive a car or vote is an absolute insult.

That’s the leftists narrative. Anyone against HR1 and federalizing the election process must be suppressing the vote. Asking for ID before casting a ballot is racist. Really? I think assuming that people can’t get an ID is racist. That’s how communism works. They use a false narrative, something no one is saying, then argue against it. What psychology!

It’s a completely phantom accusation. We need 1 vote per person and a means to insure it. Otherwise, the only vote left is “no confidence”. But a regime is not interested in the will of the people. They are only interested in power. Having Cain kill Abel is the whole idea.

Covid has already devastated small businesses across the country. Build Back Bigger means the private sector must carry an even heavier burden than they do now. Communism crushes the small and takes over the large. It squashes individuals completely.

xxx

xxx

xxx

xxx

xxx

phising

phising

phising

phising

phising